File #: 16-0075    Version: 1
Type: New Business Status: Passed
File created: 8/17/2016 In control: City Council
On agenda: 8/23/2016 Final action:
Title: Approval to Select Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. to Begin Scope Negotiations for the Comprehensive Community Visioning-Redevelopment Program
ITEM TITLE:
title
Approval to Select Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. to Begin Scope Negotiations for the Comprehensive Community Visioning-Redevelopment Program
body
SUBMITTED BY: Lisa Von Bargen, CED Director

FISCAL NOTES:
Expenditure Required: Unknown
Unencumbered Balance: N/A
Funding Source: TBD

RECOMMENDATION:
rec
Approve selection of Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. to begin scope negotiations for the Comprehensive Community Visioning-Redevelopment Program.
end
SUMMARY STATEMENT:
The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) on June 9, 2016 searching for firms with qualifications for a Comprehensive Community Visioning-Redevelopment Program. The RFQ required a pre-submittal site meeting. On June 30, 2016, eleven representatives from different consulting firms participated in a full community tour and round table discussion.
Qualification submittals were due on July 14, 2016. The City received six responses from:
o Catapult Creative Labs
o DOWL
o Houseal-Lavigne Associates
o Kimley-Horn
o SMG Consulting
o Winter & Company Team

The Council appointed a review team including three Council members (Nate Smith, Ryan McCune, Lea Cockerham); three community members (Rick Wade, Jim Shirrell, Lee Hart); and one City staff member (Lisa Von Bargen). Using the criteria outlined in the RFQ document, the review team evaluated and ranked the submittals. The top four scoring were invited back to Valdez to give in-person presentation about more detailed qualification information. Those four firms were:

o DOWL
o Housel-Lavigne Associates
o Kimley-Horn
o Winter & Company Team

On August 11 & 12, 2016, the four teams of firms gave presentations before the review committee and the City Manager. The time with each firm lasted approximately two hours and included a formal presentation where specific topics were addressed and discussion between the review panel and the firm representatives.

The review panel met on Monday, August 15, 2016 to discuss the content of ...

Click here for full text